"You can't be neutral on a moving train." – Howard Zinn
Tuesday February 9th 2010

Archives

Election eve analysis

As of Saturday, 12,144 votes had been received by the Supervisor of Elections. The over 65 voters are still the largest percentage of the voters – 4,743, 39.1 percent of votes cast. That age group has voter turnout of 59 percent. The votes are 4-to1 to the under 35 year old – 1,026 votes, 8.4 percent of votes cast and turnout percentage of 9.8 percent.

The 50-64 age bracket has cast 4,286 votes – 35.3 percent of the total cast, voter turnout percentage of 42.2 percent. This is the largest age bracket of registered voters.

The 35-49 age bracket has cast 2,089 votes – 17.2 percent of the total cast, voter turnout percentage of 36.3 percent.

The under 65 age brackets are the ones who are primarily voting now so these ratios will change some. If we assume that the majority of the over 65 vote is against change and the majority of the under 35 is for the charter, then the passage of the charter will depend on a huge Yes votes from the 35-49 and 50-64 age groups.

It’s a difficult election to predict. No Boss Mayor has no grassroots organization so its votes have probably already been cast. The pressure will be on We Believe in a Better Pensacola to get the last few stragglers to drop their ballots off at the Supervisor of Elections office.

The one positive note for the Pro-charter camp is the voter turnout by city district:

34%- Wu
29%- Hall
40%- DeWeese
40% – Johnson
26% – Jerraulds
26% – Cannada-Wynn
22% – Townsend

The African-American vote will support the status quo, but those districts aren’t voting. Wu and Hall have older districts and they aren’t voting in big numbers either.

Popularity: 21% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Tags: Pensacola, Pensacola Charter

Related posts

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Election eve analysis”

  1. Anonaly says:

    Pretty much as expected.

Read This Before Leaving a Comment

Please make sure your comments follow our guidelines:

  • Use your real name - first and last names, not keywords
  • No foul language (please)
  • Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Do not threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind. Email Rick: Rick@inweekly.net. The comment will be deleted asap.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person
  • Remember, this is my site. I set the rules and reserve the right to remove any comments that I deem inappropriate and to ban anyone who violates these rules.

Comments that do not adhere will be deleted or marked as SPAM.

 

Leave a Reply