Pensacola

Tanyard Neighborhood Association wants fish hatchery elsewhere

November 28, 2017

Officers of the Tanyard Neighborhood Association sent an email to the media stating their association “is not against the hatchery… just the location.” They don’t want it on Bruce Beach.

The email was signed by Tanyard president Marilynn Wiggins and vice president Glorida Horning.

They wrote:

“And for the record the community was never brought to the table to ask their opinion about the location of the hatchery. We were nevered asked.. example: the “retention pond.” And we see how well that is working out.

The port is a perfect location and can still bring in tourism… it a much larger space and away from our homes.

Governor Scott even said NO MONEY WILL BE LOST to move the location. Why do so many want to cram another stinky project to our neighborhood?

We are for the CRA proposed plan of 2010. Do you see hatchery anywhere? (CRA Plan, Vol. I, page 40)”

Over the past seven years, the Hayward administration has had several run-ins with city neighborhoods. In 2013, District 3 residents protested the permitting of a Dollar store on Spanish Trail.

The next year, North Hill battled the city over a regional correction and probation center planned on the North Palafox Street.

In 2015, Longhollow and North Hill fought Mayor Hayward and his administration over a radio tower built in a conservation district. When the issue started to gain momentum, City Administrator Eric Olson tried to get North Hill president Melanie Nichols in trouble with her employer.

The past two years, the fight with city hall has been over a storage tank being built by ECUA off of North Palafox Street.

Note many of these issues started to surface as Mayor Hayward dropped his town halls in city districts.

Little wonder our survey showed less than half of city voters believe Pensacola city government is headed in the right direction.

You Might Also Like

5 Comments

  • Reply EPenn November 29, 2017 at 8:45 am

    No outdoor tanks = no smell… at least no more than the FDEP swamps…

    • Reply Gloria G Horning, Ph.D. November 29, 2017 at 4:46 pm

      It will have open air ponds to recycle the water in those tanks

      • Reply EPenn December 1, 2017 at 12:37 pm

        The only open air ponds I see on the bid drawings are for storm water…

  • Reply Gloria G Horning, Ph.D. November 28, 2017 at 9:20 pm

    Our voices will be heard.

    • Reply Steve Brown December 7, 2017 at 5:51 am

      After reading the PNJ article this morning, your vision for public access to the waterfront is by far the best option proposed, I support you 100%

    Leave a Reply

    Read This Before Leaving a Comment

    Please make sure your comments follow our guidelines:

    • Please use real name - first and last names.
    • No foul language (please). Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
    • Do not threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
    • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
    • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind. Email Rick: Rick@inweekly.net. The comment will be deleted asap.
    • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
    • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person
    • Remember, this is my site. I set the rules and reserve the right to remove any comments that I deem inappropriate and to ban anyone who violates these rules.

    Comments that do not adhere will be deleted or marked as SPAM.