Rick's Blog

Convention Center Study Puts Ball in Pensacola & Escambia’s Court

Note: I opened today with WT Partnership’s assessment of our economy because I didn’t want it overlooked. The City of Pensacola and Escambia County have several significant economic development projects in various stages: American Magic/SailGP, Outlying Fields, ST Engineering, Pegasus Laboratories, REVERB by Hard Rock, Project Maeve and others. The analysis should help guide decisions on those projects.

Here is my report on the CRA meeting and the City of Pensacola Convention Center Analysis- Draft Report.


The City of Pensacola got its most detailed look yet at the future of the Pensacola Bay Center district on Monday, when consultants from WT Partnership presented a 158-page feasibility study to the City Council sitting as the Community Redevelopment Agency board.

The report’s bottom line: Pensacola has a real shot at transforming a largely vacant six-acre parking lot next to the Bay Center into an economic engine—but the window won’t stay open forever.

The Core Finding: Pensacola Is Leaving Money on the Table

The consultants found that Pensacola’s existing event facilities—the Bay Center and the Hilton Pensacola Beach—offer roughly 25% to 30% of the ballroom and exhibit capacity found at comparable Gulf Coast venues.

Real consequences: Navy Federal Credit Union holds major employee events out of state because local venues can’t accommodate them. Military and veterans’ groups wanting to hold reunions of 600 or more people in the city they served get turned away. The Greater Pensacola Chamber of Commerce caps its own events because the space simply doesn’t exist.

Four Paths Forward

WT laid out four development scenarios of increasing complexity.

Scenario One is a traditional design-bid-build convention center, 100% publicly financed through bonds and tourism development taxes. It’s the fastest to execute but produces the least economic impact and leaves the City holding all the deferred maintenance risk—the same trap the Bay Center itself has fallen into.

Scenario Two pairs a publicly built convention center with a privately financed hotel, either on the Tech Park site or at the adjacent Grand Hotel property. The consultants called this the industry standard—convention centers without adjacent hotels consistently underperform.

Scenario Three adds a parking structure and mixed-use retail to that package, structured as a full public-private partnership.

Scenario Four goes furthest, incorporating transit connectivity—bus routes, trolley integration, the potential for a Southern Rail stop—making the district eligible for TIFIA federal financing through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America Bureau. TIFIA loans carry interest rates around 4.75 percent, compared to eight or nine percent on the private market.

The Council Ask the Right Questions

Too Many Purposes? Council President Alison Patton pushed hard on whether a facility designed to do too many things ends up doing nothing well. The consultants acknowledged the tension but noted that modern convention centers are increasingly being built with modular, flexible layouts designed to serve both sports tournaments and regional conferences from a single footprint.

Right Spot? Councilman Charles Bare raised doubts about the site itself—the Interstate 110 ramp, limited walkability, the absence of nearby restaurants and retail—and questioned whether this was the right location at all.

What Happens Next

The City is now headed into a joint meeting with Escambia County on April 16 to gauge whether there is shared appetite for moving this project toward an RFP.

Citing that $75 million in tourism development tax funds—assuming the county commits them—isn’t enough to build two facilities, Mayor Reeves stated that any path that includes a new convention center requires layering private equity, federal financing and potentially CRA investment to close the gap.

The consultants said convention centers don’t make money on their own. Cities build them because everything around them does. The beach doesn’t charge admission. Neither does the national park. The Bay Center district’s return on investment will show up in bed tax and sales tax receipts.

 

Exit mobile version