Rick's Blog

Escambia Children’s Trust Puts Mental Health Programs on Hold Amid Budget Concerns

Board members raise questions about expenses, missing audits, and mission drift as three providers face additional review.

What was expected to be a routine renewal of mental health programs turned into a contentious hour-long debate Tuesday as Escambia Children’s Trust board members scrutinized how millions of dollars are being spent on informal mental health supports for children.

“There are over 40,000-50,000 children that play little league sports here. Many are poor,” said Commissioner Lumon May. “And when you go down this slippery slope of us paying for baseball players, football players, cheerleaders and everybody’s eligible, that’s a bad precedent for this organization to be doing.”

Missing Audits and Budget Questions

Twin Oaks Youth & Family Services, which requested approximately $1.128 million for Year 3, came under particular scrutiny for lacking a 2024 audit and for allocating nearly $3,000 annually per child for boxing lessons as part of their $30,000 direct services budget.

Executive Director Lindsey Cannon explained that the organization was awaiting its 2024 audit. “They had an issue with their audits, so they were able to send us 2023 and a letter from their auditor saying that they are currently processing 2024, but we have not received it.”

Concerns Over Budget Reallocations

A recurring theme throughout the meeting was frustration over providers requesting funds for specific purposes and then reallocating money to different line items without board approval.

Commissioner May pointed to what he saw as excessive administrative costs. “When you’re almost looking at personnel and benefits, over $700,000 .… Accounting $17,000, Leasing rentals $33,000, Telephones $10,000, Liability insurance $29,000…I have to see the procurement on that to see if those numbers really make sense.”

Why Not Formal Mental Health?

May raised fundamental questions about the Trust’s approach to mental health services, noting that millions are being spent on what providers call “informal mental health supports” rather than licensed clinical services.

Cannon acknowledged that the programs represent a different approach. “I definitely think that these are different type of programming because they’re informal mental health supports,” she said. “This is not certified counselors going in and doing billable work. This is prevention and an early intervention.”

Programs Approved and Delayed

The board voted individually on each program:

Board member Stephanie White suggested the approach of voting individually: “I just think there’s some, like for example, Youth Left Behind, I’m great with this. I mean is doing a great job and I’m fine with this… and.”

Next Steps

The program committee will meet again on October 28 to review the three delayed mental health programs, with recommendations returning to the full board for a vote.

Woods emphasized the need for programs to stick to their original proposals. “If you don’t use it under the line item that you wrote the grant for, that money should come back to the grant and allow us to help somebody else. You don’t just get to, well, I don’t need $50,000 here, so now I’m going to find somewhere to spend the money.”


Support Our Journalism

If you like our reporting, consider buying us a cup of coffee – here. Your donation will help broaden our reporting. Thank you.

Exit mobile version