Rick's Blog

Why Pensacola’s Biggest Private Investment Needs a Tax Rebate

Aerial

The numbers are staggering. A $280 million mixed-use development on Lot 5 at Community Maritime Park—247 residential units, a 147-key REVERB by Hard Rock hotel, a Michelin-star restaurant, 3,000 construction jobs, 300 permanent jobs and a 25,000-square-foot public plaza steps from Blue Wahoos Stadium. It would be the largest private investment in the history of downtown Pensacola, nearly double the $150 million Project Maeve at the Port.

That’s not a negotiating tactic. It’s math.

The Rebate Program’s Purpose

The tax abatement being sought through this project is not a special favor or exception—it’s a publicly established incentive created by the City of Pensacola’s Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) specifically to encourage exactly this type of development.

Background: The CRA’s Area Reinvestment Agreement for Affordable Housing (ARA-AH) program creates partnerships with private developers who can demonstrate a substantial public benefit to the community, including the creation of affordable housing, the elimination of blight and the strengthening of the local tax base.

“As a developer, applying for this incentive means meeting a rigorous set of criteria set forth by the City itself—criteria designed to ensure that any tax abatement awarded results in meaningful, lasting community impact,” said Dawson President and COO Tamara Bowens. “This is a transparent, public process governed by the City’s adopted community redevelopment plans, and the incentives available through the CRA are open to any developer willing to meet the established standards and deliver on those community goals.”

Inspired Communities of Florida (The Dawson Company) and Corporate Contractors Inc. submitted a TIF rebate application to the Pensacola CRA on February 26. The project—Rhythm Lofts and REVERB by Hard Rock on Lot 5 at Community Maritime Park—has been discussed since August 2024.

Bowens and capital markets partner Nick Steen of Avison Young met quietly last week with the mayor and council member to explain what the rebate is, what it isn’t, and why the project can’t be built without it.

The Gap Between Viable and Not Viable

The core problem: Institutional lenders financing projects of this scale—Type I high-rise construction with reinforced concrete and steel—require a blended unlevered return on cost of roughly 8.1% to 8.6%. Without the TIF rebate, this project produces a blended return of about 5.4 percent. That gap doesn’t get filled by creative financing or sheer will.

That’s a remarkable statement on its own. The project’s primary financial backer is Diane Hendricks, co-founder of ABC Supply and founder/owner of Corporate Contractors Inc., one of the wealthiest self-made entrepreneurs in the country.

What the Rebate Actually Does

The application requests a 20-year, 100% abatement of property taxes on the 198 rental units and the 147 hotel keys.

The gross annual tax increment the project would generate once complete is $5.6 million. After the TIF rebate and the Live Local Act exemption on the 99 middle-income units, the City nets $1.74 million per year from day one of stabilization. That’s compared to exactly zero dollars the vacant lot generates today—a lot that has sat empty for over a decade.

Without the rebate: The most viable alternative for Lot 5 is a single-use, mid-rise hotel generating $1 to $1.25 million annually in taxes—with no affordable housing, no public plaza, no structured parking and none of the cultural amenities the CRA has been calling for on this site for years.

The Brownfield Reality

One factor that gets overlooked in the conversation about incentives is the site itself. Lot 5 sits on a former EPA brownfield—legacy creosote and PAH contamination from the old Frisco Docks rail and pier operations.

Before a single vertical beam goes up, the development team faces extraordinary environmental remediation costs: FDEP-certified segregation, testing, special handling, regulated disposal and ongoing monitoring.

Greenfield developments elsewhere don’t carry those costs. They’re unique to this site and they directly suppress the returns the project can generate—which is precisely the kind of circumstance that tax abatement tools were designed to address.

A 70% Abatement, Not 100%

One point worth clarifying from initial media coverage: because the 49 condos are excluded and will pay full property taxes, the effective abatement on the total project works out to roughly 70%—not 100%—when viewed against the complete tax picture.

The ARA application now goes to the CRA board for a recommendation, with a city council vote expected sometime in May. Lot 5 has waited long enough. Read Pensacola CRA TIF Rebate Application

 

 

Exit mobile version