Rick's Blog

Escambia Children’s Trust Approves $1.85 Million Deal with City of Pensacola, But Not Without Concerns

The Escambia Children’s Trust board voted yesterday to approve a negotiated interlocal agreement that will send $1,85 million to the City of Pensacola, resolving a nearly two-year dispute over tax increment financing revenues the city says the Trust owes to its Community Redevelopment Agency. Read City Interlocal.

The Dispute

The dispute drew headlines in June 2025, when the city formally demanded TIF contributions from the children’s trust under Section 163.387, Florida Statutes. The Trust responded by filing for an exemption, which has pending before the City Council ever since. Both sides chose to negotiate — the same approach used to resolve a similar dispute with Escambia County.

The Deal

The trust will pay $1,851,333.70 covering tax years 2021 through 2025, with penalties and interest waived. The total reflects a credit of $537,679.30 — representing 75% of what the Trust has already reimbursed the city under an existing parks and recreation grant. The city’s position is that not all grant money was spent within CRA boundaries, so a full offset wasn’t warranted. The 2026 tax year is not covered and will require future negotiations.

Reeves Calls the Deal an ‘Olive Branch’

While the Trust board debated the agreement, Mayor D.C. Reeves addressed it at his weekly press conference, framing both the credit and the scope of obligations as concessions.

On how the money would be spent, Reeves pushed back against locking the city into specific projects. “We’ve said we’re going to help childcare. That is what we intend to do and that has not changed, but it’s pretty difficult for us to say, ‘We promise that we’re going to use it on this building in this particular location.’“

The Chair’s Concerns

Northup saw it differently. He pointed to the Trust’s own RFP process and the detailed goals, measurable outcomes, and reporting requirements imposed on community providers — contrasting that with the city’s broad obligations under the interlocal.

He pressed the Trust attorneys: “Are you all comfortable that there’s enough meat on the bones… that when we write that check, are we going to get the return on investment that we would be expecting from other providers? And is this document going to hold their feet to the fire?”

The Counterargument

Executive Director Lindsey Cannon acknowledged the discomfort but framed the situation as fundamentally different from a typical grant.

She said the city has already issued an RFP for a childcare provider — a pilot program it hopes to replicate using the trust’s funding — and that the city has facilities that could support programming, which she called “a really challenging issue in our community.”

The Vote and Next Steps

Board member Stephanie White moved to approve: “If this is the same that we did for the county, then I think that we just need to approve it and move on.” The motion carried with Woods as the lone dissent.

The agreement will go to the City Council at the first meeting in March, where it will be presented as the Trust’s request for a TIF exemption. Mayor Reeves is expected to recommend council grant the exemption and approve the interlocal.

 

Exit mobile version