Pensacola City Council, First Amendment: ‘You’ve gotta walk the walk’

On Thursday, the Pensacola City Council showed its confidence in Council President Brian Spencer in reaction to a letter Mayor Ashton Hayward sent regarding Spencer’s handling of a Sept. 20 meeting.

Councilman Larry Johnson tried to position the vote as an attack on the mayor’s First Amendment rights. The sponsor, Councilwoman Sherri Myers, said the council should exercise its First Amendment right and show that the mayor’s comments were “unjustified.”

In the end, the council agreed with Myers, but the discussion was not without melodrama.

In her introduction of the agenda item, Councilwoman Sherri Myers said, “I went back and watched that meeting. I felt like our Council President did a magnificent job of conducting that meeting, and I feel that the comments made by the Mayor in his letter were totally unjustified. I just would like for the Council to show a vote of confidence in how the Council President handled that meeting on September 20th.”

Councilman P.C. Wu said he was caught “between a rock and a hard place in trying to decide who was right and who’s wrong.” He believed that his choice was between showing confidence in Spencer and the Mayor’s right to free speech.

“It was a very difficult meeting to get through, but my only point and I’m taking too long to make it, is that I don’t believe that the Mayor gives up his right to say what he feels, although at the same time, I have the utmost confidence in you,” said Wu.

“This is not a First Amendment issue. Nobody’s saying the Mayor or anyone else doesn’t have the right to express their views,” countered Myers. “However, when the Council is accused, and the Council President, of doing things that are not true, I think that we have the First Amendment right to state our views on that opinion.”

She added, “I don’t know how us saying that we have confidence in our president in any way interferes with somebody else’s First Amendment Right. I mean, if somebody says something about you that you don’t agree with, you certainly will correct them and that’s what gave impetus to this motion I have here.”

Councilman Larry Johnson expressed his confidence in the council president. However, he was upset with remarks made by some of citizens that attended the Sept. 20 meeting.

“I think that members of the audience were rude. I think that they were disrespectful. I think that we must maintain a certain decorum in this room that wasn’t maintained that night, but I think you did try to do the best job you could. I could not have done the job you did, so I just want to recognize I think you did an outstanding job that night. Thank you for that and if I vote “no” for this, it has nothing to do with a vote of confidence for you, but I do believe in First Amendment rights and I believe that everyone has those,” said Johnson.

The councilman then expounded on his support of the First Amendment.

“I believe that some people talk the talk, but you’ve gotta walk the walk,” Johnson said. “Somebody might say something that you don’t like, but as the gentlemen that spoke to us earlier at the Boyd forum says, they have that right as an American.”

He claimed that comments were made by the audience toward City Attorney Lysia Bowling that “that were screened from the audience.”

“You can’t sometimes support the First Amendment if it goes along with your agenda, but if it doesn’t, then you don’t support someone’s right to express themselves. That’s just not America,” said Johnson. “I agree with the speaker at the Boyd forum tonight that said you have to listen sometimes things that you might not agree with.

He continued, “I think this is an instant where the Mayor expressed himself with a letter and I support his First Amendment right and I will not be voting for this tonight, but please understand President Spencer, that I have full confidence in you.”

When the public was allowed to speak on the agenda item, Councilman Johnson walked out of the room.

He later returned to cast the lone dissenting vote on the vote of confidence.


2 thoughts on “Pensacola City Council, First Amendment: ‘You’ve gotta walk the walk’

  1. An Attorney’s Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar
    “I do solemnly swear:
    To opposing parties and their counsel, I pledge fairness, integrity, and civility, not only in court, but also in all written and oral communications;…….

    City Council Special Meeting 9/20/2017 4:00 PM

    Was the September 20th Special Council Meeting a planned, coordinated attack on City Council?


    • Lysia Bowling delivered a legal opinion to the Council one second before taking their seats on the dais. (Can one imagine how a Judge would have reacted had this been done in a court of law? Was she directed to make such delivery at such time? Does it matter at the end? She delivered it absent fairness, integrity, and civility.)
    • President Spencer then realigned the visibly confused meeting and read the legal opinion to the public. (A legal opinion that stated ECUA has “plenary authority” on city property without obtaining Council consent.)
    • President Spencer went on, with complete respect and conducted a very intense and informative meeting that resulted in hearing “the people,” {1:38} and making a motion based on “process” to “direct administration to instruct ECUA a legislative body to bring this matter before Council to stop construction at 17151 Guilemard until ECUA submits proposed project and project documents for Council consideration and approval…….”
    • Council Larry Johnson, who was absent for most of the meeting appears and inflames the issue with legal counsel fees. {1:49}
    • Council Larry Johnson then disrupts any further communication and calls for the vote {1:54}. The motion fails. (Precedent setting; The Pensacola City Council voted down any and all of their own authority for ECUA to do what they please when they please and how they please.
    • Council Larry Johnson then calls point of order and calls people in the audience rude {1:54} Walking the walk.
    • A motion was then made to address the matter again. White the motion passes, Council Larry Johnson votes against giving the City some authority and a process for ECUA to follow.
    • Council Larry Johnson then makes outbursts of a disrespectful audience and “this is what we have to endure every time with North Hill,” {1:57} before finally stating “Im out of here” and leaving the meeting. Walking the walk.
    • On September 22nd. Mayor Hayward sends Council President Spencer a letter expressing his displeasure with the disparaging remarks made against City Attorney Lysia Bowling. The issue is, there were no disparaging remarks made.
    As such I will ask again: Was the September 20th Special Council Meeting a planned, coordinated attack on City Council?

    To continue the subject matter that this article represents:

    “When the public was allowed to speak on the agenda item, Councilman Johnson walked out of the room.
    He later returned to cast the lone dissenting vote on the vote of confidence.”

    Houston, we have a problem!

  2. I think it is past time Larry Johnson resigned his District 4 seat on the council. He is no longer represents what the citizens of this district think.. I believe he has some serious problems that he needs to address.

Comments are closed.