Beach Haven boogie

The Escambia Board of County Commissioner discussed at its Thursday, Feb. 4 meeting the bid tabulation for a $11.8 million project at Beach Haven. The tabulation showed there was only one bidder, Roads Inc. The bids were opened on Nov. 12, and Roads Inc.’s bid was higher than the engineer’s estimate of $10.3 million.

“It’s unacceptable for someone to bring an $11 million bid with one person,” said Commissioner Lumon May. “We spent $30 million in change orders on debris…There’s no way we don’t have reservation for $11 million for one bid.”

He added, “If it’s not time sensitive, how can we justify spending $11 million with one bid?”

Commissioner Steven Barry asked, “What’s the plan on the award for this? How can we only have one respondent? This is large a project; that’s not normal at all.”

Joy Jones, the head of county engineering, told the commissioners the award would come back before the board on Thursday, Feb. 18.

“I don’t know the exact details, but I do know more than one set of plans were picked up for the bid, but only one bid came in,” replied Jones. “So I haven’t talked to the purchasing agent about it. And I wasn’t on the committee.”

Barry said, “I can’t imagine that it’s going to be a healthy conversation (on Feb. 18) because this has been going on for two and a half months.”

Commissioner Doug Underhill was also concerned about the a single bidder. He said, “We talk about this quite a bit, and yet it seems like we have an awful lot of one bidder or a few bidders

County Administrator Janice Gilley was silent for most of the discussion. The day after the meeting, Gilley sent an email about the Beach Haven project to Melissa Pino, a candidate for the District 2 commission seat that brought the bid tabulation to the board’s attention.

Gilley wrote, “The board was informed of one bidder at the last 1.21.21 meeting and they approved the reallocation of funding for it.”

Why didn’t the county administrator mention this during the board’s discussion on Feb. 4? Why let her staff struggle answering the commissioners’ questions?

Inweekly found the Jan. 21 agenda item that asked the board to approve the reallocation of funds to cover $1.5 million shortfall for the project.

From the background summary: The construction bid opened for Beach Haven NE Phase II and the County received one bid from Roads, Inc. of NWF, for $11,802,627.89. Beach Haven NE Phase II is a large-scale, multi-phase joint stormwater and sanitary sewer improvement project in the Beach Haven neighborhood.

Current available funds total $11,214,722.66. The design engineer of record, McKim & Creed’s preliminary construction estimate is $10,300,000, without contingency or construction engineering inspection (CEI).

Typical planning percentages for contingency and CEI are 10% each. Engineering staff plan to assign a County Inspector to this project, which allows Engineering staff to recommend lower percentages for contingency and CEI, at 3% and 5.5%, respectively. With this, the following is a breakdown of the estimated cost for the project:

Construction Cost: $11,802,628
Contingency 3%: $350,000
CEI 5.5%: $650,000
Total for Project: $12,802,628
Existing budget funds: $11,214,722
Project Shortfall: ($1,587,906)

It appears that the county administrator’s strategy is to entrap the board and leave them little choice but to award the $11.8 million to Roads, Inc. Gilley wanted the commissioners to approve the reallocation on Jan. 21, which covered the cost overrun. Then she wanted them to vote to accept a grant for the project at the Feb. 4 meeting.

When the award came before then on Feb. 18, she would tell the board the funds are allocated and a grant has been accepted, and the board needs to give the project to Roads, Inc. If the board refused, Gilley would complain to the daily newspaper about how dysfunctional the board is and how long it takes to get anything done.

The proper way to handle it would have been to put all three items – award, reallocation and grant – on the same agenda. The board and public would have gotten a fuller picture of what is happening.

Why is Gilley making the board and public jump through all these hoops for a project?

Share:

1 thought on “Beach Haven boogie

  1. So many things, Rick. It’s hard to know what my favorites are.

    I loved the fact that NOBODY in Gilley’s staff claimed any knowledge. And that Joy Jones fell back on “Ima gonna be bringin this right. Mel Pino is the bad girl who brought this under blackout.”

    Perhaps better still is the anonymous campaign Gilley’s agents posted on Jeff Bergosh’s blog with a crap ton of disinformation.

    On a different subject, after the PNJ article on Gilley advertising to get Public Safety resumes, as a result of me pounding on her for months on end to come clean to the BOCC about our EMS staffing and get it out there per our lack of medics, EMTs, and Fire–why wasn’t there a follow-up article from the PNJ on her money-hiding on our EMS budget that she flat-out admitted to me in a Sunshine email? (“It’s not my fault–the old new software I boxed the BOCC into purchasing stinks and that’s why I need my new-new software I’m boxing them into as duck and cover.”)

    It goes on and on. After this item she attempted to discredit me by putting out on her “coconut telgraph” (her bud Doug’s phrase) that our head of purchasing was not, in fact, forced to resign before his time.

    Sorry, Gilley. People who are immune to the BS that for some reason the Board keeps accepting from you know full well Paul was in the first year of his drop. And you fired Regina Hall in Budgeting the same day–or woops, you made one of your hit women do it. And then that same person turned around and sent out a glowing email on Regina’s service.

    Why was Regina fired? Maybe because she was the last person who understands the budget games Gilley is running at the County. Clearly, the new Budget manager does not.

    Bottom line number 1: if Gilley is allowed to continue in this role for any amount of time–particularly after she has now broken the cardinal rule of throwing her Board under the bus on her own corruption–her ineptitude and self-interest will put this County in a place that we won’t recover from for 20 years.

    Bottom line number 2: if the BOCC doesn’t wake up to the money games she has been running on them, they will all be up in front of investigations at some point. I simply cannot understand why they sit up there and let her run on with her statute-breaking.

    Do they have a problem with managing female direct reports? If so, from one woman: you guys wouldn’t let a man pull this crap. Let the PNJ do their worst to shield her (and I won’t even get into Alison Rogers here). I can tell you, as a member of the gender, I ain’t impressed with her self-victimization. Women do not need exceptionalism to succeed in executive roles. And Gilley is a total embarrassment to all women every time she bats her eyelashes, squirms in her seat, and cries about how hard her job is.

    Pathethic. FIRE. HER. NOW.

Comments are closed.