Homeless Task Force to deliver recommendations today

by Jeremy Morrison

Homelessness comprises myriad issues beyond the lack of shelter. As such, there are just as many potential remedies. This week the Homeless Reduction Task Force of Northwest Florida will present to the Pensacola City Council a slate of recommendations to assist the homeless community.

The task force previewed its recommendations for the city council in September and then shored them up during a meeting in late October. City Council President Jared Moore skipped that final task force meeting on purpose. He wanted to let the group’s recommendations reach the council’s table organically and uninfluenced.

“I don’t need to shape it before it gets to me,” Moore told Inweekly recently.

City officials have requested the task force’s recommendations with the intention of potentially funding some of them with $3 million of American Rescue Plan Act funds. Moore expressed concerns that the lure of these federal dollars may be tainting the purity of this mission: “It’s almost like the city won the lottery, and we’ve had long lost family members coming out and saying, ‘yeah, we work this field.’”

Councilwoman Jennifer Brahier shares this concern.

“People are coming out of the woodwork for it,” she said. “But it’s not a lot of money when you look at what you have to do with it.”

Brahier is also concerned that charging the task force with presenting recommendations with the potential of funding them may have distracted the group—made up of various service providers and interested parties—from its original mission of digging into the area’s homeless landscape to collect the data necessary to guide future decisions, funding and services.

“They’re such complicated issues and there’s such a rush to get this money dispersed among people,” Brahier said, wondering if there “wasn’t enough fact-finding done.”

Mike Kimbrel, director of the Alfred Washburn Center and task force sub-committee member, believes this is the case. Before being approached by the city, he said, the group felt geared more toward data collection.

“And then $3 million hits the table, and all that went out the window,” Kimbrel said. “We went from collecting data on this community to ‘how do we spend this money?’”

That said, Kimbrel said he generally supports some of the task force’s recommendations. In particular, he likes the notion that Vinnie Whibbs of ReEntry Alliance Pensacola, of REAP, has put forward of establishing a handful of campground-type properties in the area, some with temporary shelters; Kimbrel has long operated Satoshi Forest, a like-minded camping operation that Escambia County fought for years.

“Naturally, I’m a supporter of campgrounds, but I think they’re a hot-button issue. No one wants them in their area. And I think the task force is too rushed — they’re probably going to shoot themselves in the foot,” Kimbrel said, noting that at least Whibbs was tweaking the vernacular and avoiding words like “campground” or “shelter”: “I did like that Vinney’s calling SOS, safe outdoor spaces. He’s kind of getting it.”

This issue of encountering resistance in whatever area a property servicing the homeless is established has become a problem for a growing encampment under the Interstate 110 overpass near downtown Pensacola. Moving that encampment — which the city is allowing to continue as it attempts to figure out how to place the campers in shelters or housing — is among the aims of these recommendations and the federal funds.

Task force head Connie Bookman, who operates Pathways for Change, has predicted that the encampment can be cleared by Thanksgiving. Mayor Grover Robinson has set his sights on January. But Councilwoman Brahier isn’t sure relocating the camp is the best idea.

“I don’t know if relocating the homeless encampment is benefiting anybody,” Brahier said.

The councilwoman acknowledges that the city has gotten quite a bit of negative feedback from residents living close to the encampment—“we’re getting emails left and right”—but said that’s going to be the case anywhere.

“For me to even remotely pretend that I have a better idea—I don’t. I’m just not sure anyone does,” the councilwoman said.

Kimbrel said he thinks the campground has well outgrown a manageable size, describing it as the “wild, wild west.”

“It’s hard to manage over 30 people,” he said.

For an example of a better, more manageable scene, he points to the outdoor space at the Alfred Washburn Center, where individuals can find coffee, pastries and picnic tables to sit and rest and think.

“Just kind of get their heads together — how are they getting out of this situation? What are their next steps? Just a place to decompress,” Kimbrel said.

Under the I-110 overpass a few days ahead of the task forces’ delivery of its recommendations to the council, a young couple sat among a collection of tents and scattered belongings. In early November, the couple had a baby. Their baby’s delivery date and time are written in marker on one of the tents: “11-3 @ 2:49 a.m.”

“Because we’re in this situation, the state has her right now,” said the woman, who goes by ‘D.’

“It wouldn’t be appropriate for a child to be out here,” said ‘Neo,’ the baby’s father, adding that the couple both have fast-food jobs lined up.

The couple said that a woman with a local service organization had assured them that they would be in housing before the baby was born. The experience has soured them on any progress the city might be about to make.

“Our views would not be very — what’s the word?” D said.

“Tasteful,” Neo said.

“That’s the word,” she said.

Considering his own recommendation to the city, if he were to make one, Neo aims for simplicity: give the homeless houses.

“They do have housing. Houses that are abandoned and not used,” he said. “they could always put people in them. Just to get people on their feet.”

That’s not likely to happen. Finding properties for those campgrounds will be tricky enough. Whatever happens, the ensuing discussion when the city council receives the task force’s recommendations will be pretty interesting.

“I think Wednesday is going to be a complete shitshow,” Kimbrel predicted. “From what I can gather, it’s all over the place.”

— For more on this issue, check out this week’s Inweekly.

Share:

1 thought on “Homeless Task Force to deliver recommendations today

  1. Just to be clear, the $3 million is real money. It is money that the city could use for some other purpose such as a year’s worth of stormwater projects, or the Tippin Park Community Center, or a new tennis center or soccer center on the west side, etc. Every city council member who votes to effectively waste $3 million should be held accountable by voters. First up in 2022 are Moore and Hill. Imagine the reaction among District 4 and 6 voters to learning this next summer that they voted to divert $3 million from a city need to address a county problem. Most voters do not know because they do not get the daily newspaper, do not watch Channel 3 news and do not read blogs. This is and always has been a county problem and every part of the city is in the county. The fact that there is a large gathering of homeless people in the city is mostly because the Robinson Administration refuses to enforce the city laws that prohibit camping in city parks. Similarly, the city refuses to enforce its own panhandling laws. Bookman has said that these are “our people.” If so, why not move them to Roger Scott near her home where Robinson, Bender and Moore live too. Of course not. To date, no one has reported where these people lived if they lived anywhere before they took up residence under the I-110 bridge. The BCC has $27.1 million in American Rescue Plan dollars sitting in the bank with nothing to spend it on. Perhaps the homeless industry types should pressure them to come up with a solution. Beulah is booming. How about a homeless city at OLF-8? It’s currently a very big empty field owned by the county. The homeless could walk over to the Navy Federal Credit Union campus to get a shower, massage, work out in the gym and maybe get a job too. So what next? Obviously, the new camps will become full and the homeless will roam around their new neighborhoods and hang out at the fast-food joints begging for money and maybe hang out at local schools too. Stuff will be stolen from nearby homes and there will be other crimes. And the word will get out that Pensacola and Escambia County eagerly welcome and will pay to give free stuff to people who show up and say, “I am homeless.” In sum, both will be sanctuaries for the homeless. You can bet that they wouldn’t put with that type of nonsense in Santa Rosa County and certainly not in the City of Gulf Breeze. And you can bet that if the homeless dared to camp out at church ground those God-fearing people would go nuts and declare they be cleared out.
    More homeless will keep coming and we’ll just keep doing this over and over and over.

Comments are closed.